Boooriiing!

Guests of the weekly Gang-up

Guest host: Susan Page (neutral objective journalist)
Jim Angle, FOX News Channel
David Corn, Washington editor of "The Nation" and epitome of civility. Jeanne Cummings, The Wall Street Journal

What a boring week! Yawn! Now that the new conservative Democrats are in power and there are no scandals to drive for weeks on end by the Demomedia (Democrat media as in NBC, ABC, CBS, NPR, CNN) it seems that besides the Trump vs. Rosie O'Donnell war nothing else was going on.

Well, we could have had more coverage on the senseless and spineless non binding resolution by the U.S. Senate against the "surge" of American troops in Iraq proposed by President Bush but we didn't.

Frankly, it was so boring that I didn't feel like posting anything this week. I don't know what I will do if this most ethical Congress of all times continues to operate. Yet, at least we know that someone was squirming enough on the sidelines not to be sidelined that all of a sudden we started finding out more about the "O". No, not the Oprah, we are talking about the other "O" from Chicago, the Obama. Remember him? Yes, we are talking about Sen. Barak Hussein "Don't talk about my ears" Obama.

Well, it appears that infatuation does tend to blind lovers. After weeks of Demomedia hyperventilation it seems that certain aspects about their beloved were overlooked. According to various reports the Clinton camp seems to feel really threatened by the real surge that really matters to them, the surge of the "O". According to these operatives, the Clinton camp have let loose an onslaught of emails "exposing" first the Senator's middle name, Hussein, and most recently information concerning the Islamic background of his upbringing and education, supposedly including indoctrination in fanatic Muslim schools.

Following all these revelations and considering that the "O" is showing a consistent popular lead over the "H" it is not surprising that the Clinton camp will be forced to advance their announcement for the 2008 race. Do not expect a negative campaign against Sen. Obama from the Republican camp; at least not as dirty as that coming from the Democrats, they don't need it. Republicans are already benefiting from the campaign by the Democrats. The question is whether and when will the Demomedia join in for the kill.

So far Sen. Obama has not received much enthusiasm from the African American Democratic Party establishment either. You see, Sen. Obama is not known for having been part of the Democratic Party-Civil Rights Movement and racial politics apparatus, and unless they can determine whether he can play ball in the scheme of things he is not going to be supported. Besides he represents not the government African American of the dependency plantation but the immigrant Black whose family has been able to accomplish a middle class life with a son in the Senate without the baggage of the racial politics machine.

That runs against the grain of the racial welfare lords in the Democratic Party. The only way he has a chance is if he gets the Clinton machine to support him and that machine is already dedicated to the "H" candidate, or if gets the old Black Civil Rights Welfare plantation establishment overseers to support him. But the masters of the Democratic Party/liberal welfare plantation are the Clintons, and they get to determine who comes into the house. After all African Americans already had a president according to author Toni Morrison, who declared President Clinton "the first Black president" and they may explain why a Black was never appointed to high-level decision making office during that administration.

Unless Sen. Obama becomes a "house negro" (I assume this is an acceptable term since it has been used by liberal African Americans in reference to Gen. Colin Powell and Dr. Condoleeza Rice) in the Democratic Party plantation like some of the "civil rights" leaders and some in the Democratic Black Caucus, he will be looked upon with jealousy and suspicion. So, before he gets the "Ok" there will have to be more than one "sit down". And that my friends, is the bottom line.

Maybe we will move from the fight between The Donald and The Rosie to the war between the "O" and the "H". Let's hope so. I'm bored. This Congress is too ethical!

BEWARE OF THE TWO-HEADED MONSTER BIRD CREATED BY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-MEDIA INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!

Guests of the weekly Gang-up first hour: Tony Blankley, editorial page editor of "The Washington Times."
E.J. Dionne, Washington Post columnist, David Gregory, White House correspondent for NBC News and maximum exponent of White House Press Corps civility and distinguished member of the Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex.

Guests of another well balanced panel, second hour: Rajiv Chandrasekaran, assistant managing editor for continuous news, The Washington Post. Doyle McManus, Washington bureau chief, "Los Angeles Times" Barbara Slavin, senior diplomatic reporter, USA Today.

President Eisenhower warned us of the military-industrial complex for the possible damage it could bring to the republic. But he could not foresee the strange creature that has come out as result of another type of complex: The Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex. The strange creature is a two-headed bird full of itself, pompous in behavior and vain as it could be. The bird has an incredible ability to disguise which direction is looking at, therefore, it is almost impossible to catch. The bird is properly named the Demomedia.

The Demomedia is capable of making strange noises and moves that make the inocent looker forget all previous noises and moves made by this bird. And while you are looking at one head the creature is actually looking at you with the other head. While you are listening to noises made by one head you can't hear the noises of the other head. Here are some examples of what the Demomedia birds does when it makes its appearances in shows like the DR Show and others.

NO mention of the many leading Democrats who just before the elections were calling for more troops for Irak, or as they call it today "a surge". Before the elections Rep. Pelosi and Sen. Biden among other leading Democrats, criticized the President for not having enough troops in Iraq. Consistently they called for more troops, not less. Have any of these leaders been faced with their comments by the Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex? NO. Will they? NO. The evidence is solid that they did support more troops. All they have to do is ask Tim Russell for the tapes.

Why aren't the Democrats calling for a right out defunding of the troops? Because they know that the American people will not support it. So they will continue to grandstand for the purpose of pleasing the noisy fringe of their party at the expense of national security. Will they be challenged by the Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex? Mr. Dionne, Mr. Gregory admit it, you are not neutral "journalists" and no matter what President Bush does you will not approve. You are members of Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex.

You did not hear about her Nancyness' possible ethical limitations regarding the recent raise on the minimum wage. Well, it just happens that American Samoa was excluded from the minimum wage raise. And according to the chairman of the House, Education and Labor Committee, Democrat George Miller of California, it's because the economy of American Samoa doesn't have the ability to handle the United States' minimum wage and should be exempt.

But as it has already been alerted by the alternative media that there could be another reason. It has to do with the tuna industry. It has been reported that "the average wage for tuna workers in American Samoa is $3.60 an hour." And that one of the biggest employers there is Starkist Tuna with headquarters in San Francisco; Rep. Nancy Pelosi's territory. Will Mr. Gregory, Mr. Dionne, the DR Show or any of their fellow journalists of the Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex take a closer look at Nancy Pelosi's campaign finances? Don't hold your breath.

You did not hear about Sen. Barbara Boxer's attack against feminism either. During Secretary of State Dr. Rice's appearance before a Senate hearing the millionaire Boxer said to Dr. Rice: "You're not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with an immediate family." She was refering to the fact that Dr. Rice is not married and is also without children of her own and therefore had no price to pay in Iraq. Now apparently only people with children have a stake in Iraq, but also one of the major tenets of the feminist movement is obsolete. It seems that choosing a high level career over men and having a family is no longer looked upon as laudable in Democratic Party sectors. The feminist movement sought to erase from society the stigma of the childless professional woman as incapable of concentrating on her job. Now the Boxer has given it a nockout. Will the Democratic Party-Media Industrial Complex pursue an apology from Sen. Boxer? NO, not while is feeding the head that makes you look at the other head.

BEWARE OF THE TWO-HEADED MONSTER BIRD CREATED BY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-MEDIA INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID!

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070112-120720-2734r.htm

WHICH WAY WILL THEY LOOK?



Guests of the Weekly Gang-up:
Clarence Page, syndicated columnist, "Chicago Tribune"
Jerry Seib, Wall Street Journal
Byron York, White House correspondent for National Review and author of "The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy"






While Democrats rushed to their first press conference they were reminded of who claims to have put them in power. Lost cause célèbre Cindy Sheehan and the tin foil troops showed up to heckle Rep. Rahm Emanuel who had to give up and cancel his press conference. This might be a sign of things to come once the ecstasies of having the first woman as Speaker of the House wear out. Is it going to get boring? With Democrats now "in power" the Weekly Gang-up and the media in general might get boring. I mean, I cannot imagine the press going after the first woman to make it to Speaker of the House in the same manner they went after Newt Gingrich. So after a generous allowance for the traditional honeymoon there is something to demand: Please stop the fluff! Let's hope that NPR, the DR Show, etc., will show the same zeal to examine the record of the "new conservative" Democrats as they have done with the Republicans.

The Democrats may be over-playing their hand and their interpretation of the elections as a mandate for surrender in Iraq, and as an approval of the “cut and run” policy of the Rep. Murtha, Rep. Kucinich, Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan wing of the party. Yes, the American people are not happy with the way things are regarding Iraq. But the media has a tendency to believe their own spin and their own carefully crafted politically motivated polls, namely, “things are so horrible in Iraq that there is nothing positive about it and the public therefore oppose the war as we do.”

But this doesn’t translate into a desire by the American people to surrender. Just as the specter of Vietnam serves as the “boogey man” to scare us out of foreign involvements, it also serves as a lesson for those who understand and do not overlook the other side of the Vietnam War; what happens when you send out a signal of weakness.

So once the Democrats come back from their honeymoon they will have to consider which way to look; more to the left, or more to the right? If they do not follow through on their “cut and run”—hmm, “redeployment”—policy they will not please the time warp peaceniks, if they do they will not please the majority of American people which realistically understand the consequences of a politically motivated pull-out.

So, again, once the ecstasy is over, please stop the fluff you have dealt with this morning and let us hope you will keep a close eye on the promised “most ethical” Congress in history. I guess, in order to do that we will put aside any investigations on the “less than clear” defense contract dealings of Rep. Murtha, Rep. William Jefferson of Louisiana, the meaning of the theft of documents by Sandy Burger, the shady real estate dealings of Rep. Reid and even of her Nancyness.